Neil Kittipalo wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 May 1996, Staffan Sevon wrote:
>
> >
> > What about a HP48emulator, now that would really be useful (providing it
> > was just a bit bogger than the microscopic HP12C already bundled)
> >
> I'd like that, too. Seems to me it'd be hard to get th needed
> code onto even a 2 MB SRAM card.
> BTW the latest OG (plus??) appears to have Quicken included - I
> have not braved Bangkok traffic to examine one yet. No mention of this by
> anyone. Is Quicken burnt into ROM, or does it eat RAM? Are there any
> other differences? An updated ROM for instance. Anyone know?
> Neil