Re: Tanget: 80 cpl DOS (Was Re: Hello and a question.)

William Ofosu-Amaah (XI6W-OFSA@asahi-net.or.jp)
Tue, 30 Jul 1996 13:31:10 +0900

Man F Wong <Man.Wong@internetmci.com> wrote:
> > I also went from a 200LX to the OGO. THe lack of 80 columns didn't
really
> > bother me until I saw the light (err, make that the DOS prompt :-)
>
> I never owned a 200lx, but I'm a programmer who's grown quite used to 80
> cpl displays over the years, and I can see the truth in your words ;-)
(All
> right, all right... I'm hamming it big time :)

Good one! :-)

> It'll be perfectly unreadable even if you render it in a
> variable font, in which case you might even get OVER 80 characters per
line
> if they're just 1's. :)

I tried 80 cols on the OGO using TEXTEDIT and setting the font size
to 6 points. It wasn't pretty :-)

> Also, it'll probably increase the cost of the
> display rotate feature significantly (in $$$ and performance).

I don't know if it will add much cost to the price. It would affect the
speed of rotation but I don't think it will be that bad I would gladly
sacrifice a little speed in rotation for a bigger screen and iIf Apple can
do it I'm sure HP can also do it :-)

>
> BTW, the Zaurus does not support 80 cpl. It does upto 63(?).

Thanks. I read the 80 cols bit in Byte Magazine but was a little
skeptical. I had a chance to play with a Zaurus 5000 after I posted
the article and I couldn't get 80 cols.

On a tangent, I also got to play with a Newton 130 at the same time. Nice
backlighting!
I definitely want this. I was disappointed with the handwritting though.
I could easily outwrite it (which I can't do with Graffiti) and it didn't
recognize my handwriting very accurately in both printed and cursive modes.

I will take Graffiti any day. Anyway, I digress and this ain't the place
for this :-)

William