Zoomer Developer Licensing
Politico96@aol.com
XXX, 30 Aug 1993 01:05:07 -0400 (EDT)
Mark,
I don't worship either company or get my paycheck from them, but I have seen
and used both as Beta versions, so the end product may vary. . .
Newton: The Newton is prettier and is a of higher hardware technology, for
what thats worth, The Handwriting recognition is faster on the Newton, but,
this is the Big Problem, its guesses can be EXTREMELY inaccurate, and I've
yet to see a built in keyboard for the Newton. (somebody help me out on this
one) Also, ink cannot be converted to text once it is saved as ink. The
Newton isn't quite as fussy about the types of PCMCIA cards as the Zoomer.
Expect to replace the batteries every three to four days on 4 AAAs .
Zoomer: More workmanlike in its shape and feel. Handwriting is slower but
more precise, but you can only print, no cursive. I am 90% certain that
diacriticals can be hand entered if you are clear in your writing, but the
built in keyboard can solve that. (it's really easy to use) Notes can be
stored as ink and converted later, a definite plus. The Zoomer has specific
requirments for PCMCIA cards that eliminate a lot of the current products. A
Zoomer will last anywhere from two to six weeks on its batteries 2 AA,
depending on the amount of useage.
Conclusion, both products are basically equal on the applications with a
slight edge to the Newton, but the economical and flexibility points go to
Zoomer hands down. Sharp won't drag their heels though, and you can expect
them to work on it. Right now, I would buy a Zoomer. It's cheaper, more
efficient,and does everything the Newton does. Six months from now, who
knows? That will be after Christmas and there should be enough coins in the
coffers of Casio and Tandy to stay up. Two Choices, Be Stylish and High tech
with the Newton or save money and batteries with the Zoomer.
Peace,
DANSubj: HP deskwriter support !!