One of the few times I've read Consumer Reports, they had an
article on batteries. Included in the article was an evaluation
of Alkaline rechargers, like the BuddyL, and the concluded the
same things you did, that they really don't work well at all.
Another subscriber to this list asked about using Lithium
batteries in the Zoomer. Well, Consumer Reports tested a variety
of batteries -- alkaline, nicad, and lithium -- and (surprisingly
to me) they found that lithiums provided little extra time
in standard applications (walkmen and such) than alkalines.
While I don't claim to understand why, despite their higher
power capacity, they apparently are best at providing long shelf-life
and high, but short, current draws (such as camera flashes).
So, based on the article, lithiums shouldn't perform much better
than alkalines, and you shouldn't put too much faith in alkaline
rechargers.
For me? I'm delighted with the life the zoomer gets from standard
alkalines, it's more than I expected. I don't welcome the hassle
of nicads or the expense of lithium.
Dean
--
.... ___ \ ____/ __ \ \ . | Dean Cashen, SW Development Engineer|
... / / / / / \ / .. | Hewlett-Packard Company, SSD |
.. / / __/ __ / \ / ... | 11413 Chinden Blvd. |
. / / / / / / \ / .... | Boise, ID 83714 MS 202 |
_____/ _____/ __/ __/ __/ __/ ..... | (208) 396-3635 Fax: (208) 396-5117 |
| deanc@hpbs114.boi.hp.com |